Mannequin of a Tautavel Man—would he have had known how to make fire?
Photo credit by Eric Cabanis/AFP/Getty Images.
The heated archaeological debate about which hominids first started cooking.
Richard Wrangham, an anthropologist at Harvard, claims that hominids
became people—that is, acquired traits like big brains and dainty jaws—by mastering fire. He places this development at about 1.8 million years ago. This is an appealing premise no matter who you are. For those who see cooking as morally, culturally, and socially superior to not cooking,
it is scientific validation of a worldview: proof that cooking is
literally what makes us human. For the rest of us, it means we have a
clever retort the next time one of those annoying raw-food faddists
starts going on about how natural it is never to eat anything heated above 115 degrees Fahrenheit.
There’s one problem with Wrangham’s elegant hypothesis: It’s hardly
the scientific consensus. In fact, since 2009, when Wrangham explained
his theory in the book Catching Fire,
several archaeologists have come forward with their own, wildly
divergent opinions about what is arguably the oldest intellectual
property debate in the world. Who really mastered fire, in the sense of
being able to create it, control it, and cook with it regularly? Was it Homo erectus, Neanderthals, or modern humans?
Read the rest of this article...
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.